| Parameter | Where | Measured | Score | How it was arrived at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Catchment
50
weight 20%
|
500 m | 1,970 people | 50 | 803 aged 18-64 + 1,167 workers = 1,970 over 0.79 km2 = 2,509/km2 |
| 2 km | 24,554 people | 50 | 8,933 aged 18-64 + 15,621 workers = 24,554 over 12.57 km2 = 1,954/km2 | |
|
Competition
69
weight 15%
|
500 m | 0.00 wt | 100 | 0 genuine gym floors and 0 other sports sites within 500 m, weighted by substitutability and price tier |
| 2 km | 5.50 wt | 48 | 7 genuine gym floors and 1 other sports site within 2 km, weighted by substitutability and price tier | |
|
Capture
44
weight 20%
|
500 m | 1,285 people | 54 | 728 residents + 556 workers, demand within 500 m against every competitor within 3 km |
| 2 km | 3,771 people | 38 | 2,285 residents + 1,486 workers, demand within 2 km against every competitor within 3 km | |
|
Saturation
0
weight 15%
|
500 m | not measured | — | catchment of 1,527 residents is below the 10,000 needed for a density measure to mean anything — one club would move it by 6.0 LQ |
| 2 km | LQ 3.93 | 0 | 7 clubs / 16,182 residents = 43.26 per 100k against 11.01 nationally | |
|
Fit
—
weight 10%
|
unit | not measured | — | no floor area recorded for this unit |
|
Rental
—
weight 10%
|
unit | not measured | — | no rent or no floor area recorded |
|
Income
26
weight 10%
|
500 m | 0.76× | 0 | 16,970 EUR against 22,380 nationally, median of 1 IRIS within 500 m |
| 2 km | 0.93× | 43 | 20,800 EUR against 22,380 nationally, median of 8 IRIS within 2 km |
| Band | Gym floors | Other sports | MCI weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| within 500 m | 0 | 0 | — |
| 500 m – 1 km | 2 | 0 | 2.00 |
| 1 – 2 km | 5 | 1 | 3.50 |
| 2 – 3 km | 1 | 0 | 1.00 |
| Within 3 km | 8 | 1 | 6.5 total |
| Ring | Residents | Per km² | Median age | Adults 18–64 | Share of residents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 km | 1,527 | 1,944 | 45.5 | 803 | 53% |
| 1.0 km | 6,299 | 2,005 | 45.6 | 3,376 | 54% |
| 2.0 km | 16,182 | 1,288 | 46.9 | 8,933 | 55% |
| 3.0 km | 19,970 | 706 | 47.4 | 10,981 | 55% |